The Impact of Self-Efficacy on Motivation and Learning Engagement in Online Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/659w6j20Keywords:
Self-Efficacy, Motivation, Learning Engagement, Online Courses, Online LearningAbstract
With the rapid expansion of online learning, understanding the psychological factors that influence learners’ success has become increasingly important. This study investigates the impact of self-efficacy on motivation and learning engagement in online courses, aiming to clarify the mechanisms through which learners’ beliefs about their capabilities affect their academic behaviors. A sample of 356 undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in fully online courses participated in the study. Data were collected through validated self-report scales measuring online learning self-efficacy, motivation, and learning engagement, and analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, multiple regression, and structural equation modeling (SEM).
Results indicate that self-efficacy is a significant predictor of both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, as well as behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement in online learning. Moreover, motivation partially mediates the relationship between self-efficacy and learning engagement, suggesting that learners’ confidence enhances engagement both directly and indirectly through increased motivation. The findings provide empirical support for the theoretical framework linking self-efficacy, motivation, and engagement, highlighting the critical role of psychological factors in digital education.
These results have important implications for online course design and instructional strategies. Enhancing learners’ self-efficacy through mastery experiences, scaffolding, timely feedback, and motivational interventions can foster sustained engagement, improve learning outcomes, and promote the development of lifelong learning skills. The study also identifies avenues for future research, including longitudinal and experimental investigations of self-efficacy interventions and the exploration of contextual and cultural factors affecting online learning engagement.
References
[1]Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
[2]Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.
[3]Hartnett, M. (2016). Motivation in online education. Springer.
[4]Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-efficacy and motivation. Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 34–54).
[5]Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
[6]Hodges, C. (2008). Self-efficacy in the context of online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1–18.
[7]Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance. Springer.
[8]Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260–270.
[9]Shen, D., Cho, M.-H., Tsai, C.-L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 1–6.
[10]Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731.
[11]Wang, Y. D., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking online classes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 151–163.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Low Min (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
